Brand marketing a bad investment? www.moreonbrands.com
browse more on:  ADVERTISING  •  ART  •  DESIGN  •  FASHION  •  SOURCING
Follow us on
  |  
Subscribe
RSS
  |  
MORE news
Article 

Brand marketing a bad investment?

by Aldrich Boyne on July 05, 2011 and filled under Brand Management
FRANCE    July 05, 2011    MoreOnBrands

I happened to see an online article on BNET recently with the headline: “Brand marketing = Bad investment”. Obviously, this got my attention. Could have I been wrong all these years believing in the power of brands? Am I the one missing out? I had to read on. Here is the cornerstone of their argument: “The only way to create brand preference (and command a higher margin per unit sale) is to offer a better customer experience.” They site a recent Nielsen survey stating that more than 60% of consumers think that stores’ generic products are equal in quality to brand-name ones. This article believes that brand marketing may have worked in the “good old days”, but in today’s information-rich environment, it’s all about customer experience.

 

I half agree with the article’s premise. Customer experience is critical to defining your brand. If your staff doesn’t deliver the brand promise, you’ve already lost the game. If your product doesn’t fulfill the brand promise, you won’t get a second chance. The experience your customer has with your brand is vital.

 

Here is where I disagree with the author:
 

Brand experience is beyond customer service. Customer service is a portion, and a very critical component, of the experience. But, there is much more to brand than that. It’s really not complicated to deliver great customer service. It’s hard, but not complicated. The point is, it’s easily duplicatable. Brand is something that is difficult to duplicate. It’s the emotion fulfillment the brand delivers. It’s who they are as a company or product. (no different than who you are as a person) It is this element that helps gives them a second chance when a screw up happens, and it will, because no one or no company is perfect. Brand is what sets up expectations and promise. Deliver on that expectation and you’re gold. Don’t deliver on that, customers feel lied to. I will use the same example the BNET author used to make my point. The Apple iPod is the standard in MP3 players. I do believe the Nielsen survey is right, people do think quality between a brand name and a generic is the same. If that’s true, why doesn’t the generic become the standard that everyone wants and is measured against? Why is the iPod still the leader instead of the many generic MP3 players? It’s really because of what Apple stands for. It has built an emotional brand image of “cool and intuitive” through their consistent brand marketing over the decades, along with their customer service. The author states Apple TV as a failure because of their “lack of customer experience”, but in actuality, Apple never dedicated any marketing resources to back the product. Without marketing, it’s an up hill battle.

 

People still want to feel good about their purchases. Yes, most all consumers would say that generics are as good as brand names. If that’s true, Apple, BMW, Coke, and McDonald’s shouldn’t matter. The best sellers should be ACME laptops, no name vehicles, Big Cola (a generic brand), and your local burger joint. Think of it this way. If brands don’t matter and all that counts is customer service, we all should be wearing the same kinds and color of clothes. Something of a national uniform because the customer service is good, it’s cheap, and it’s well made. But most people buy clothes on how they make you feel. Does the new Michael Korrs dress make you feel prettier? Do the new Nike’s make you feel quicker? And, if you feel prettier and quicker, do you act differently? Do you feel more confident than you did? It is this emotional quality that governs how and why we buy. A book I warmly recommend is “Why We Buy” by Paco Underhill.

 

Yes, customer service and customer experience counts a lot. I completely agree. It’s part of the brand, but not the whole brand. Brands fulfill an emotional need in all of us at different levels. We each have things that are important to us where we won’t skimp for the generic alternative. Whether it’s tech components or fashion, there are brands that mean something to us in our own, unique worlds. So, if you think brand marketing is a bad investment, that’s your choice. To me, you’re heading down a path of commodity road and eventually you might find yourself out of sight because you won’t matter anymore. Because, when you’re a commodity, you’re no one.

 

by Tony Fannin, President, BE Branded

About Be Branded

Tony Fannin is of President of BE Branded, an integrated marketing firm who helps clients BE Somebody to their customers. If you aren't somebody, then you are commodity.

Comments    
Received 0 comment... Showing 0 of 0 ...
180 X 60
Browse more on: Brand Management in Article
Tags (click for more Related Topics):
   
 
Leave a comment Login/Register Now
(Your message will be posted as 'Guest' because you're not logged in as a member. )
 
Name (Required)
E-mail (Required)... (will not be published)
Website
Security check
Please type the characters you see in the picture below *
 
20
Posts
-
555
Visitors
-
555
Page Views
-
0
Comments
-
4
Members
-
50
Followers
-
0
Subscribers
MoreOnBrands is a distributor (and not a publisher) of content (including all copyrighted images, audio and video clips, and other media files) supplied by third parties and Subscribers. Information or content expressed or made available by third parties are those of their respective author(s) or distributor(s) and not of MoreOnBrands. Accuracy, timeliness, completeness, or usefulness of any content is not guaranteed. Issuers and not MoreOnBrands are solely responsible for the accuracy of the content. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms of use and privacy policy.